National Agenda Becoming Clearer

 

Breadcrumbs

Main Content

National Agenda Becoming Clearer

Image of Professor Paul Thomas, Vice-Chancellor

13 November 2004

The national media reporting of the meeting between Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee (AVCC) and the Federal Minister, Dr Brendan Nelson, has given prominence to threats, conflicts and divisions. But that wasn't a fair reflection of a discussion that ranged across indexation of university grants, the teaching and research involvement of universities, workplace reforms, State-Federal governance of higher education, and compulsory student union membership.

These matters had been raised in the media by the Minister recently when he signalled he wished to revisit some of the reforms passed by the Senate in December 2003. The way in which these matters had been treated by the media last week resulted in the AVCC inviting the Minister to talk directly with us, which he agreed to do, along with his most senior officers.

Dr Nelson commenced the discussion by carefully outlining his views on the issues. He did so in a methodical and balanced way without a hint of threat, and stressed the need for discussion and dialogue, and welcomed further interactions with vice-chancellors.

None of this, of course, sells newspapers, and the next day there was talk of 'bans', 'secrets', and so on, which I am sure sold more papers, but also made the subsequent debates harder to handle, because adversarial positions are presented to the different parties and the predictable comments flow.

The issues that were actually raised, and the way they were discussed, was in reality an attempt to resolve important issues in a positive way.

There was an outline of what is happening to higher education globally and how that is impacting on Australian universities, and in particular, to generate world class teaching and research. This is an absolutely necessary discussion topic at a time when universities' roles are to be redefined to allow for 'teaching only' and when private educators and international universities are attempting to become higher education providers here.

There was discussion of the Federal Government's agenda for workplace changes, for example, to ban the withholding of students' results by staff, and the need to offer Australian Workplace Agreements to staff.

There was also discussion of both the merits and demerits of Federal-State reporting requirements, and universities only having to report to one level of government to cut down on the massive reporting requirements expected of us and give the Commonwealth greater powers over a sector they fund.

Dr Nelson expressed his views about student unionism and their political activities being supported by compulsory fees from students. No specific secret plan had been hatched by the universities - it was an occasion for seeking clarification of the government's position, and there was a range of views on how a compromise might be struck, following different experiences in Victoria and Western Australia, in particular.

This was an important meeting for the AVCC and there were many positive reassurances provided by the Minister, particularly on issues associated with State-Federal control, and also that no government should force a 'teaching' or 'research' label on any university - and that the universities are in the best position to judge needs and emphases.

This University will certainly want to continue to progress its own distinctive teaching-research nexus, because this region needs both outstanding university programs, as well as regionally and internationally significant research to mobilise further economic activity and contribute to our quality of life.

Professor Paul Thomas is Vice-Chancellor of University of the Sunshine Coast