What Will Trigger a Rational Amalgamation?

Send this page to a friend

Your name:
Recipient name:
Recipient email:
Message (optional):

What Will Trigger a Rational Amalgamation?

Image of Professor Paul Thomas, Vice-Chancellor

10 July 2004

The simple sign on the Bruce Highway's northbound lane, south of the Caloundra turn off, has for years been welcoming people to the Sunshine Coast, identified as the four Councils of Maroochy, Caloundra, Noosa and Cooloola.

The latest State Government maps prepared for the Department of Communities identifies the Sunshine Coast as the area from north of Gympie to south of Caboolture.

Recently, both the Premier and the Deputy Premier have visited the Coast and delivered a clear message that the Coast councils need to amalgamate or continue to lose out on the acquisition of funding because of the absence of unified regional advocacy.

For an increasing number of influential people the matter has become serious. Their belief is that we are, through our complacency and lack of leadership, compromising the quality of life for Sunshine Coast residents into the future. As the tourism industry expands, so the needs of residents are further marginalised, disguising fundamental and endemic shortcomings in the economic and cultural provisions that will provide the social stability for a growing population, and the glue for community health.

The State Government has said it won't trigger an amalgamation and that the impetus must come from the Coast. The reason for this seems to be that, although the Gold Coast amalgamation has been a success, at the time it was a State Government electoral liability. On this Coast that has long been conservative heartland, and is now gradually shifting to Labor, there is probably little enthusiasm to unsettle that foothold.

What, then, will trigger at least an initial rational debate on the major issues? What may eventually influence public opinion? At the moment, because of the absence of leadership and information, majority opinion is understandably opposed to a change as the benefits have not been made clear. And most people do not have the time to pore over State Government and other documents which have provided a compelling case for over a decade.

As it is not going to be the State that takes the lead, it is equally obvious that local councillors are not going to take the initiative to vote themselves out of office.

The Property Council, Chambers of Commerce, and other economic organisatons are viewed with some suspicion by many residents as developers do not have an unblemished record on matters of profiteering and self interest.

State and Federal politicians seem in favour of an amalgamation of some kind but they can hardly be expected to coordinate community activism, beyond the occasional speech or media release to provoke public debate. Equally, the Area Consultative Committee might be seen to be too political, and an arm of government administration, just like State Development.

In the meantime, we have diversionary or compromise strategies to address what remain major regional issues, through SunROC, or suggestions of Cooloola-Noosa, as well as Caloundra-Maroochy, and even possibly a hinterland shire.

Diversions, divisions and discord abound on this issue and it is both frustrating and upsetting for those of us who are concerned about the future of the Coast to see the absence of information and logic alongside the proliferation of defensiveness, prejudice, and misinformation.

In the meantime, the cane lands, an internal communication system of roads, buses, and monorails, as well as the airport, water, bandwidth, power, pollution, culture, environmental degradation, new urbanism, jobs, all get too little unified attention. Residents are becoming the losers, but it is their children and grandchildren that will really have to bear the consequences of this neglect.

The University itself is continuing to work on these issues and produce the information that will perhaps, with the help of sympathetic media, be able to enhance the debate.

It would be very difficult for the University to ever lead the debate because its work would be compromised and it would become a 'political football' which we have strenuously tried to avoid from our earliest days.

The issue will not go away, but what will be the trigger for the quantum leap forward that is so urgently needed?

Professor Paul Thomas is Vice-Chancellor of University of the Sunshine Coast


  • ABN 28 441 859 157 |
  • CRICOS Provider No 01595D |
  • Updated: 09 Jan 2012