A Regional or Feudal Future

Send this page to a friend

Your name:
Recipient name:
Recipient email:
Message (optional):

A Regional or Feudal Future

Image of Professor Paul Thomas, Vice-Chancellor

20 May 2006

After being away from the University overseas for seventeen days, one of my initial tasks on return is, as usual, to catch up quickly on regional media. Thus, I read seventeen 'Dailys' in one hit rather than being drip-fed every day.

Important, recurring themes in the development of the Coast are thrown into sharper focus when the span of articles are taken together.

I noticed that one of the Coast's major unresolved issues, for example, was raised again by Minister Desley Boyle in relation to possible amalgamation of Councils. Almost paralleling that issue was the report on Ted Fitzgerald's address that different, competing centres are emerging that make Maroochydore's status as the major regional centre less than a certainty.

The coverage raises the question of whether regional unity really does matter, or is disunity acceptable or even desirable in the name of competition and individuality.

For me, regional unity is vital on the big issues. Some of those big issues have been identified by SunROC as their priorities. In particular, a focus on the knowledge economy, job generation, and a technology precinct have been identified as a regional priority with respect to Sippy Downs and the University.

The announcement by the Premier that a hospital complex would be built next to the University was entirely consistent with the SunROC priority. As the Premier has pointed out, it is world's best-practice to collocate hospitals and universities, because joint programs and research will lead to more knowledge economy jobs and spawn new, related industries nearby in the emerging technology precinct.

Minister Cummins openly backed the Premier and hailed the announcement as Smart State thinking at its best.

The decision was consistent with the South East Queensland Regional Plan for Sippy Downs to be a 'knowledge hub' and the Premier's own view that it would also soon be a 'heath hub'.

The Mayor of Maroochy also developed an election blueprint on job generation in the new economy, and expressed support for such developments near the University.

From all these official sources there appears to be unity. It might have been expected that all of these people involved would have welcomed and sustained their commitment to the collocation prospects.

No one could possibly argue a case that the job-generation impact of the hospital could be greater elsewhere on the Coast.

Yet, we have disunity on the issue with Maroochy Shire Council and Kawana interests competing directly for the hospital, when world's best-practice examples palpably contradict those arguments.

This issue that should have so unified the Coast and presented us with unique infrastructure, has become enmeshed in the politics of the original decision-making process, and the opportunism of other interest groups.

The original decision was sound even though the process may have been flawed. The original decision should stand.

We therefore still have a long way to go to achieve regional unity on the huge issues that face the Coast. If collocation is compromised, the extensive regional rhetoric about unity will be cruelly exposed as a sham, and the residents of the Coast will be the losers.

Residents everywhere in the Twenty-first Century will increasingly be concerned with well-being, job security, quality of life and health, and the way that communities elsewhere are addressing this future is by collocating or amalgamating the power of hospitals and universities. Collectively they can accomplish more than they can separately. Anything other than collocation will be a compromise and it is a pity that we remain so feudal that we can't unequivocally recognise this.

Professor Paul Thomas is Vice-Chancellor of University of the Sunshine Coast


  • ABN 28 441 859 157 |
  • CRICOS Provider No 01595D |
  • Updated: 09 Jan 2012