The Importance of Both TAFE and University

Send this page to a friend

Your name:
Recipient name:
Recipient email:
Message (optional):

The Importance of Both TAFE and University

Image of Professor Paul Thomas, Vice-Chancellor

18 March 2006

It's been another week or two when universities have been subject to some unnecessary criticism.

One national newspaper took from the Business Council of Australia's report on innovation a slant that universities were stifling entrepreneurship. Our local paper, on the basis of a small survey, suggested trades are not being given a fair go, and that university was not regarded by some as the only answer. The State White Paper which generates more apprenticeship places also prompted some comment about how more emphasis should be placed on TAFE rather than universities.

There are some fundamental problems that face Australia that are disguised not too thinly, in these kinds of views.

Let's put aside the usual criticism of the media who it is said just want to sell papers or increase their audience, so conveniently slant issues to suit their sales purposes.

Instead, let's unravel some of these issues because they are extremely important and go to the heart of some more parochial isolationism and our future in the world.

Firstly, universities are doing more than ever in their history to connect with the worlds of work at the undergraduate level. USC does more than most.

Secondly, I don't know of any informed people who have ever said university is the only answer. The history of universities is that they have been of and for an elite. Most remain so. Universities still attract a minority of the age cohort. USC, however, has the highest first-in-family and low socio-economic students in the country, so we are broadening the applicant base more than most here. Perhaps we should be denying entry to larger numbers of students, as some commentators think?

Thirdly, there has for years, been many points of convergence between the intellectually-driven universities, and the skills-driven TAFE sectors. On the Coast, Mike Anderson and I are as one in ensuring there are more links between our two institutions.

But neither of us has ever engaged in a discussion about one institution being better than another. He is an advocate for Sunshine Coast TAFE and I for USC.

Many TAFE areas of study internationally are changing, and the same is true in universities. On the one hand, just about every skill area in TAFE is more demanding and computer-based than ever before whether it's the motor industry, marine navigation, photography, hospitality - they are all becoming more intellectually demanding and IT-related.

At universities, undergraduate studies are no longer conducted in splendid isolation, and work experiences are becoming common.

If Australia is to retain or enhance its position globally, then avoiding the false dichotomy that suggests either TAFE or University is better than the other is an imperative.

To power this country we need people to think, to explore, to discover, to enhance, to construct and a lot more. Most will be better equipped to achieve if they undertake further studies that they believe are best suited to them.

It is their choice and it is not either/or, nor is it a case that universities have had a better deal than TAFEs. I know first-hand how tough it has been at a new USC.

Let's together press the importance of further study because it is the future of this still small country, still as tyrannised by distance as it ever was.

Professor Paul Thomas is Vice-Chancellor of University of the Sunshine Coast


  • ABN 28 441 859 157 |
  • CRICOS Provider No 01595D |
  • Updated: 09 Jan 2012